« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »

December 27, 2006

Jobster Layoffs - Realigning

I read today on ERE.net which referenced the article on the Seattle Post Intelligencer about Jobster layoffs, new CFO and essentially the deflating of Jobster. First I’m not happy seeing people being layed off, companies going under and not succeeding as it’s very difficult to run a company get funding and grow, however in this case I believe it was only a matter of time. A couple of CEO’s in the community knew the day would come and it has.

Why did it happen? Let me help shed some light on this, this is my personal opinion on what I have learned from the past 3 years of owning my own company and building it from scratch without any funding.

• Money everywhere.

Jobster isn’t that different from every company from the dot com era, get money, spend it fast. From my understanding they have 145 employees new office space and I can’t remember the last time I didn’t see any jobster marketing.

• You played now pay.

Anytime a venture capitalist (some know them as vulture capitalist) give you money it comes at a very high price. This price includes 3x the amount back they gave you, they run the show and they don’t take no for an answer. Even though it’s your business, your background, they run the show and run it for all it’s worth.

• Buy don’t build

With the amount of money and funding that Jobster received they really should have been on a buying not building spree. There are plenty of companies in the space that have great technology, people, customers and more importantly revenues. New website, and product development takes time, let me take that back it takes more time than you initially thought it would take.

• Stay focused

Companies start out with a great idea and then as they grow get diluted with partners, partnerships, new products, tasks, hiring, management and the list goes on and on. Jobster launched with one product and when that didn’t sell they then changed their stripes, again, and again and again. If your potential customers can’t tell who you are what you do and how you do it then how do you grow? (Guilty as charged)

• Don’t Hire Fast

We are growing and that’s a good thing, but don’t forget that old adage “growing pains” it’s a good problem to have but let me remind you of this. For every person hired it takes one more person to train that person and to do a knowledge transfer for them to be efficient and contribute to the company. Meanwhile that first person has to still complete their job so this is a very delicate balance.


Hopefully jobster is able to realign, get more customers and be profitable by 07. Hind site is 20/20 I wish them all the best.


December 14, 2006

Best Recruiting Blog Voting Now Open

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of my 2006 readers. It’s amazing how many times I get on the phone and get complimented on my newsletters and or articles. Without you reading I would have no one to write for. So Thank You.

I have been nominated for best blog for 2006 so please click here and vote for me.

December 11, 2006

2007 Leaders or Followers?

The three things combined that made me want to write this article would be in no specific order.

1. The interview with the CEO of netflix.
2. Lou Adlers article on ranking candidates.
3. A commercial for a new vacuum by Black & Decker.

You must be saying, wow those are three things that have absolutely no connection to the recruiting industry, the title of this article or the price of tea and china. Well my friend, you’re wrong, and here is why.

For the past three months, we have been examining, and I mean examining, our pricing model, the recruitment industry, the players, the percentages, and we’ve really being involved in deep conversations. We are also talking with potential clients about their platform budgets for next year, what they have used in the past, and decisions on what they will be using in the future. This last piece begins our leader or followers conversation.

2007 gives new opportunity to clean the slate and to choose if you want to lead the recruiting community, instead of following. The leaders would be people who are bucking the system, not relying on one tool and/or site to give them the holy grail of candidates and the thinkers outside of your current model and or structure. I would consider these people the Level 5 people Lou Adler spoke about. The other portion of leading is going out and researching new tools and methodologies, not only researching them, but implementing them. I find a lot of clients who I talk to want to do it but very little of them actually pull the trigger and make decisions on it.

As we begin the journey into 2007, we will learn more about candidate behavior and/ or the real value that vendor tools, relationships, and ROI will bring to the table. Another thing a leader does is constantly evolve change and admit mistakes. While watching the six minutes piece on Netflix, the interviewer asked the CEO how to find the phone number to their customer service. After several painstaking minutes, he was unable to find the phone number. You have also heard about now downloading movies directly to your desktop (e.g. Vongo, Apple) well he is aware of the pending threat to his business, and will start offering this service as well.

And lastly, the vacuum commercial. It amazes how many vacuums are out there. It also amazes me how many times we just take the same old product and stamp it “NEW”, “ENHANCED”, “NEW AND IMPROVED” or we just completely remake the product and sell it again. As was the case with the new Black & Decker vacuum that I saw advertised. First, it’s a vacuum, and we know they all suck (no pun intended) but this new vacuum is great because it has an attachment that now is specifically designed to get the dirt out of lights that are hanging. So now I have an old idea, (the vacuum) with a new twist (the want for the lights) with an old twist (I have a vacuum with an attachment that works just the same) In this case I would classify Black & Decker as the follower, they have no innovation, little to no return on investment from the new product, and haven’t solved a problem, as you already own a vacuum.

So for 2007 will you be?

A. The CEO of Netflix
B. The vacuum
C. None of the above